The Big Business of Prisoner Care Packages: Inside the Booming Market for Food in Pouches (2024)

Loaded on Oct. 8, 2018 by Taylor Elizabeth Eldridge published in Prison Legal News October, 2018, page 28

Filed under: Food/Commissary (Private Prisons), Food, Commissary. Location: United States of America.

Share:

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on G+ Share with email

by Taylor Elizabeth Eldridge,The Marshall Project

Ed. Note: PLN’s August 2018 cover storyexamined prison food and commissary services. This article looks at prison and jail package services supplied by private vendors – some of which, like Keefe, also provide commissary services.

It’s the holiday season, but many incarcerated Americans won’t get presents directly from home.

To stop drugs and weapons from entering jails and prisons, many corrections agencies bar family members from mailing packages or bringing them during visits. Those who want to send food, clothing and other gifts to incarcerated relatives – at any time of year – often must go through private vendors.

Here’s how it works: Families shop from print and online catalogs supplied by care package companies. Every item is prison- and jail-approved. In some facilities, that can mean no glass or metal containers or no personal hygiene products containing alcohol. Items are often contraband-proof, from sealed food pouches to clear electronics to pocketless sweatpants.

For the holidays, families can choose from seasonal products; think red and green cream-filled Hostess cupcakes and peppermint Twinkies. The Los Angeles County jails’ contract for care packages includes annual “gift packs” that are given to prisoners for free during the winter holiday season, complete with a card from the county.

At least one program, Access Securepak, offers religious items, including the Bible, rosary beads and Allah pendants.

Prisoner care packages are part of a lucrative industry that provides a range of services to incarcerated people and their families. Companies that offer care package programs often bundle additional services, such as phone and commissary, into one contract with a corrections agency. Keefe Commissary Network, which along with Access Securepak is part of Keefe Group, reported net sales of over $375 million from care package, commissary and technology programs in 2012, according to a 2014 contract proposal posted on the West Virginia state government website. Access Securepak had over 125 active custom package programs nationwide in 2014 and was the exclusive provider for 18 state departments of corrections.

Keefe Group, based in St. Louis, Missouri, is comprised of several companies that provide services to prisons and jails nationwide, including care packages, commissary, video visitation and surveillance technology. Keefe is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of TKC Holdings, which is indirectly controlled by the Miami-based private equity firm H.I.G. Capital.

Companies often offer their services at no charge to corrections agencies along with a share of the profits. In its bid for the West Virginia contract, Union Supply Group, which oversees Union Supply Direct, projected that the state stood to earn about $95,000 in one year, based on a 17 percent commission of annual care package sales.

The privatization of services at correctional facilities generally leaves prisoners and their families with fewer choices, forcing them to do business with certain vendors or go without, says Wanda Bertram, a spokesperson for the Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit that advocates for incarcerated people and their families and has conducted research on predatory practices in the prison and jail communication industry.

Although catalogs can contain hundreds of items, some relatives lament their inability to send a personalized gift. “We want to love the prisoner. We don’t love their crime, but we love them,” says Julie Tyson of Morehead City, North Carolina, whose son is incarcerated in a state prison. “It’s hard to do that through the calls and brief visits. It would be so nice to send a pair of socks or something I went and picked out for him.”

Perhaps becauseprison meals often leave much to be desired, food tends to dominate care package offerings. Most snacks and meals are heavily processed and packed with sugar, fat and sodium. (Food typically must be in hermetically-sealed and tamper-proof packages, which rules out most fresh options.)

There’s often a variety of pre-made gift packs, like the “Heat and Eat” package sold by iCare, a program of the stadium and schools food service giant Aramark, that contains a quesadilla, soda and 10 packs of ramen noodles. Other examples of gift packs include:

• “Hugs and Love.” This pre-assembled package is advertised as a chance to send a loved one “a gift bag full of their hometown snack favorites,” according to iCare’s online catalog. At the Lenawee County Jail in Michigan, “Hugs and Love” costs $55.99.

• “Mega Meal Pack.” With about four dozen individual items, this gift pack is one of the largest pre-made packages sold by Access SecurePak, and contains a variety of snack foods. At the Pima County Jail in Arizona, it costs $56.

• “Miss You.” This gift pack will warm “the heart and soul with a creative blend of snacks from Frito Lay and Ramen,” according to iCare’s online catalog. At the Wicomico County Jail in Maryland, “Miss You” costs $32.99.

Most food items can be stored without refrigeration and consumed in a cell with the help of a hot pot, including dried ramen noodles, instant coffee and mac and cheese. In some cases, the snacks – such as Big Haus Sausages – are made exclusively for correctional facilities; other items, like single packets of mayo, are typically not sold individually.

iCare even allows loved ones to send prepared hot food to prisoners; for example, New York, Virginia and Tennessee each have a jail where prisoners can receive an Angus double cheeseburger, a calzone or a pepperoni pizza.

The three major care package providers, Access Securepak, Aramark’s iCare and Union Supply Direct, each have relied on incarcerated workers. Access Securepak has used prisoners to unload trucks, stock and pick items from warehouses and assemble packages, according to a 2015 West Virginia contract proposal. In its 2014 bid, Union Supply Direct reported that it employed prisoners to, among other things, clean freezers and manufacture clear electronics sold in its package program.

“We deliver experiences that enrich and nourish millions of lives every day,” Karen Cutler, vice president of corporate communications for Aramark, wrote in an emailed response to questions. Correctional facilities determine the prices, nutritional guidelines and labor model used in their contracts with the company, she said.

Keefe Group and Union Supply Direct did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Prisons and jails have long restricted the types of items prisoners can receive from the outside – nothing with poppy seeds, for example, or no boxer shorts with patterns on them. And where packages from home are allowed, workers have thrown away those that contained forbidden items. So some families may consider ordering through authorized private vendors, which only offer pre-approved goods, to be more convenient than navigating a prison’s Byzantine gifting rules.

But others say sending packages through these companies can be onerous and expensive.

Corrections agencies set different rules for how many gifts prisoners can receive and how often they can receive them. In some facilities, prisoners who are eligible to receive packages (usually those who are lowest risk and have good behavior) can get a care package once every three months; at others, prisoners are allowed weekly deliveries. The timelines are strict, said Joi Davis of Clarksville, Tennessee, whose husband has been incarcerated since 2003. “If you miss the window, even by one day, you can forget it,” she said.

Packages can also be limited by weight, price and item count. Many facilities don’t allow packages that weigh more than 30 pounds. Gifts are often limited by dollar value; in some places, the cap is $50 a week, at others, it’s $150 every three months. The number of items, like hair ties or sunglasses, can be restricted as well.

“It’s a taxing experience,” Davis said. “There should be other avenues for families to be able to send their loved ones items that they want and need.”

Family members also complain that they’re often forced to buy their loved ones basic necessities that should be provided by the prison. Jennifer Gross of Livonia, Michigan says she sent her boyfriend, a prisoner in the Michigan Department of Corrections, a care package containing toilet paper after he told her he had gone without for four days. “We don’t expect for all our loves to be freed,” she said. “We just want them to have the basic needs and nutrition they deserve.”

Price is another issue. Relatives say that some goods sold in prison-approved catalogs cost more than they would in a store. At the very least, the pricing of items can be unpredictable. At the Franklin County Jail in Pennsylvania, for example, a radio from Access Securepak costs $22, but in Custer County, Nebraska the program sells that same radio for just under $13. At the Arrendale State Prison in Georgia, a wire-free bra from Union Supply Direct is $13.80; at the Northeast Correctional Complex in Tennessee, the company sells the same bra for $25.95.

Such variation comes from how individual contracts are negotiated between corrections departments and their vendors. In Los Angeles County, Keefe’s contract requires that prices fall within 2 percent of the cost of the same item at any three convenience and grocery stores within 12 miles of the central jail; in contrast, Aramark’s catalog prices in Santa Clara County are required only to be the same as or lower than the prices in the commissary.

In other places, pricing guidelines use the fair market price of an item as a baseline and mandate that the prices stay within 10 percent of the current selling price.

Some prisoners have filed lawsuits against prison officials and private companies over the cost of care packages, with little luck. In New Mexico, a prisoner sued over the price differences for identical products sold through county and state prisons. In California, a prisoner alleged that his family suffered by having to purchase items exclusively through a private company with inflated prices and extra fees, particularly for items that he claimed should have been paid for by the prison.

The case in California was dismissed because the prisoner was unable to pay the court filing fees. The New Mexico case was dismissed because the judge ruled that prisoners do not have a constitutional right to goods at certain prices. The judge also ruled that many of the allegations made by the prisoner could be brought only by government agents responsible for oversight of private companies, such as the United States attorney general or the Federal Trade Commission. In Mississippi, the state attorney general is currently pursuing a lawsuit against Keefe alleging fraud and bribery in its contracts with the state department of corrections.

Keefe Group did not respond to requests for comment about the Mississippi lawsuit.

Despite her frustrations with the industry, Davis estimates that she spends as much as $600 of her monthly budget on staying in touch with her husband through things like phone calls, visits and care packages. “It eats up the money, but you don’t want your loved ones to go without,” Davis said.

She has two recommendations for other families who want to send care packages to incarcerated loved ones: “Have a budget and a lot of patience.”

Note: Tony Tamer, the co-CEO of H.I.G. Capital, which indirectly controls TKC Holdings, the owner of Keefe Group, provided the endowment that funds the Tamer Center for Social Enterprise at the Columbia University Business School. The Tamer Center funds summer fellowships at organizations making social change, including The Marshall Project.

This article was published by The Marshall Project (www.themarshallproject.org), a nonprofit independent news organization covering the U.S. criminal justice system, on December 21, 2017. Reprinted with permission, with minor edits. Copyright 2017, The Marshall Project.

More from this issue:

  1. $12.5 Million to Settle Class Action Suit Over Strip Searches of NYC Jail Visitors, by Anthony Accurso
  2. Washington State: Jail Phone Rates Increase as Video Replaces In-Person Visits, by Steve Horn, Iris Wagner
  3. Florida: Federal Prison Guard Sentenced for Accepting Bribe, by Monte McCoin
  4. Class-action Settlement in Mississippi “Debtors’ Prison” Case, by Derek Gilna
  5. Colorado Accused of Failing to Comply with Settlement in Mental Health Care Suit, by Derek Gilna
  6. California Attorney Specializes in Representing Prisoners Victimized by Fraud, by Monte McCoin
  7. Angola Prison Lawsuit Poses Question: What Kind of Medical Care do Prisoners Deserve?, by Amanda Aronczyk, Katie Rose Quandt
  8. Pro se Texas Prisoner Wins $250,550 Default Judgment in Use of Force Case, by Edward Lyon
  9. Humanism to be Recognized as Approved Faith in North Carolina Prisons, by Kevin Bliss
  10. Louisiana Jail Settles with DOJ Over HIV Discrimination, by Dale Chappell
  11. Rhode Island: Life-sentenced Prisoner is “Civilly Dead,” Cannot Pursue Tort Claim, by Christopher Zoukis
  12. Florida ICE Detention Center Restricts Detainees’ Observance of Ramadan, by Steve Horn
  13. Australian Woman Gives Birth in Cell After Guards Can’t Unlock the Door, by Monte McCoin
  14. Low Pay, High Staff Turnover Drive Texas Prison Guard Shortage, by Matthew Clarke
  15. Nebraska County, Jail Medical Provider Settle Suit Over Medication Denial for $10,000, by Matthew Clarke
  16. Iowa Prison Guard Wins $2 Million on Retaliation, Disability Accommodation Claims, by Edward Lyon
  17. New York: $100,000 to Settle Suit over Rape of Trans Prisoner Held in Men’s Prison, by Christopher Zoukis
  18. Lawsuit Over Prisoner Assault at Tennessee Jail Results in Settlement, Dismissal, by Kevin Bliss
  19. Ninth Circuit Modifies Deliberate Indifference Analysis for Pretrial Detainees’ Inadequate Medical Care Claims, by Matthew Clarke
  20. Landmark Stanford Prison Experiment Criticized as a Sham, by Steve Horn
  21. U.S. Marshals Capture Fugitive Former Prison Guard After 10 Years on the Run, by Monte McCoin
  22. Kentucky Reluctantly Returns to Prison Privatization
  23. New Jersey County Pays $95,000 to Female Lawyer “Wanded” Between Legs at Jail, by Christopher Zoukis
  24. Federal Jury Awards $6 Million to Epileptic Colorado Prisoner, but New Trial Ordered, by Matthew Clarke
  25. $10 Million Class-action Lawsuit Against Virginia Jail Results in $725,000 Settlement, by R. Bailey
  26. HRDC Files Censorship Suit Against New Mexico Jail; Court Orders Dismissal Based on Mootness, by Steve Horn
  27. Florida Lawyer Arrested for Jail p*rn Escapades
  28. Two Former Oklahoma Death Row Prisoners Obtain $3.15 Million Settlement, by Derek Gilna
  29. Jury Awards North Carolina Prisoner $15,000 for Staff Sexual Assault
  30. Formerly Incarcerated Chef Plans to Revolutionize Ramen, by Steve Horn
  31. Kentucky Law Requiring Abused Spouse to Pay for Abuser’s Divorce Attorney Abolished
  32. Fifth Circuit Upholds Convictions of Louisiana Jail Staff for Failing to Stop Abuse, by Matthew Clarke
  33. North Carolina Fined $190,000 for Mismanagement of Prescription Medication, by Monte McCoin
  34. Arizona: Lawsuit Spurs Significant Reforms for Death Row Prisoners, by Derek Gilna
  35. Oregon County Pays $2.85 Million for Dehydration Death of Mentally Ill Jail Prisoner, by Dale Chappell
  36. Black Liberation Army Members Convicted of Murdering Cops Granted Parole, by Christopher Zoukis
  37. Editorial: The Case Against Florida’s Amendment 4 on Felon Voting Rights, by Paul Wright
  38. Private Prison Company Pays to Play; Federal Election Commission Fails to Act, by Christopher Zoukis
  39. The Big Business of Prisoner Care Packages: Inside the Booming Market for Food in Pouches, by Taylor Elizabeth Eldridge
  40. Solitary Confinement Reforms Sweeping the Nation but Still Not Enough, by Christopher Zoukis
  41. From the Editor, by Paul Wright
  42. Advocacy Groups Call for End to Ban on In-person Visits at Tennessee Jail
  43. News in Brief
  44. US Parole Activists Aim to Overhaul a Failing System, by Jean Trounstine

More from Taylor Elizabeth Eldridge:

  • The Big Business of Prisoner Care Packages: Inside the Booming Market for Food in Pouches, Oct. 8, 2018

More from these topics:

  • Aramark: Prison Food for Thought, May 1, 2024. Aramark, Contractor Misconduct, Food, Religious Diet.
  • Arizona Sheriff Accused of Misusing Detainee Funds to Buy Guns, Ammo, May 1, 2024. Police Misconduct, Money/Property, Seizure of Prisoner Funds, Commissary, Police/Govt Misconduct.
  • Unable to Post Bail, Detainee Starves to Death in Arkansas Jail, April 26, 2024. Private Contractors, Food, Water, Jail Specific, Control Units/SHU/Solitary Confinement, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness), Bail/Pretrial Release.
  • Suit Filed After Mentally Ill Detainee Starves to Death in Miami Jail, March 1, 2024. Food, Jail Specific, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Failure to Treat (Mental Illness).
  • Commissary and Food Service Privatization Strands Florida Prisoners in ‘Food Desert’, Feb. 1, 2024. Private Prisons, Food/Commissary (Private Prisons), PRIDE, Aramark, Food, State Law Claims, Trust Accounts, Commissary.
  • Seventh Circuit Reinstates Illinois Prisoner’s Claim Against Kitchen Supervisor for Scalding From Spilled Hot Water, Jan. 1, 2024. Prison Labor, Workplace Injury, Work Conditions/Safety, Food, Water, Sanitation.
  • Unable to Post Bail, Detainee Starves to Death in Arkansas Jail, Oct. 15, 2023. Food, Medical Neglect/Malpractice.
  • Cuyahoga County Sheriff Stripped of Jail Commissary Control After $500,000 in Inventory Goes Missing, Aug. 15, 2023. Commissary, Federal Funds.
  • Florida Returning Canteen Funds for Prisoner Programming, July 15, 2023. Seizure of Prisoner Funds, Commissary.
  • “Urine In Apple Juice”: Aramark Sued by Indiana Prisoner, June 27, 2023. Food.
The Big Business of Prisoner Care Packages: Inside the Booming Market for Food in Pouches (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Velia Krajcik

Last Updated:

Views: 5653

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Velia Krajcik

Birthday: 1996-07-27

Address: 520 Balistreri Mount, South Armand, OR 60528

Phone: +466880739437

Job: Future Retail Associate

Hobby: Polo, Scouting, Worldbuilding, Cosplaying, Photography, Rowing, Nordic skating

Introduction: My name is Velia Krajcik, I am a handsome, clean, lucky, gleaming, magnificent, proud, glorious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.